Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
LG AI ResearchExaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.35.2−77.7% Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-… is 77.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.12sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itExaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/exaone-4-0-1-2b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/exaone-4-0-1-2b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill