Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs GPT-5.5 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.3 | 37.0 | +58.8% GPT-5.5 (High) is 58.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $3,181.05 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.81s | 35.54s | +228.8% GPT-5.5 (High) is 228.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill