Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
47.00
Total cost
$3465
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.347.0+101.7% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 2.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$3,464.84— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.81s112.22s+938.1% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 938.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itGPT-5.6 Sol (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-5-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-5-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill