Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.3 | 45.4 | +94.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 94.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $364.95 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.12s | 18.82s | +69.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 69.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill