Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs gpt-oss-120b (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.60
Total cost
$123
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)gpt-oss-120b (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.311.6−50.2% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 50.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$122.71— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.81s10.75s−0.6% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 0.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itgpt-oss-120b (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill