Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs Mercury 2.5

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs Mercury 2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
InceptionMercury 2.5Off the frontier
Intelligence
12.30
Total cost
$189
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Mercury 2.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.312.3−47.2% Mercury 2.5 is 47.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$189.17— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.79s4.14s−61.6% Mercury 2.5 is 61.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.25 / $0.75
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itMercury 2.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill