Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.342.7+83.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 83.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.12s22.76s+104.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 104.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill