Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.40
Total cost
$461
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.711.4−53.8% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 53.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$460.74— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.86s19.94s+68.1% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 68.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$2.00 / $4.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/deepseek-r1-0120 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/deepseek-r1-0120?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill