Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.713.7−44.5% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 44.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.71s6.51s−48.8% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 48.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.56 / $1.68
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/deepseek-v3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/deepseek-v3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill