Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.730.4+23.1% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 23.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.71s131.52s+934.8% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 934.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$1.75 / $14.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/gpt-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/gpt-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill