Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)On the frontier
Intelligence
41.30
Total cost
$175
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.741.3+67.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is 67.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$175.20— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.30s6.93s−38.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is 38.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$1.00 / $5.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itGPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/gpt-6-1-terra-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/gpt-6-1-terra-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill