Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)gpt-oss-120b (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.710.2−58.7% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 58.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.25s10.02s−10.9% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 10.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.13 / $0.59
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itgpt-oss-120b (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/gpt-oss-120b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/gpt-oss-120b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill