Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs MiniMax-M2

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs MiniMax-M2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)MiniMax-M2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.718.6−24.7% MiniMax-M2 is 24.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.94s26.29s+120.2% MiniMax-M2 is 120.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itMiniMax-M2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/minimax-m2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/minimax-m2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill