Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.742.7+72.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 72.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.86s22.62s+90.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 90.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill