Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.726.7+8.1% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 8.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.94s16.87s+41.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 41.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill