Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 5.8 points higher (52.6 vs 46.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $1027; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba….
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 52.6 | +12.4% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 12.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,027.40 | $2,407.24 | +134.3% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.53s | 64.86s | +317.6% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 317.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 12.4% more intelligence, 134.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 317.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Gemini 4 Argon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/gemini-4-argon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/gemini-4-argon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill