Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… scores 0.5 points higher (46.8 vs 46.3) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1027 vs $207; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 46.3 | −1.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 1.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,027.40 | $206.66 | −79.9% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 79.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.82s | 46.84s | +216.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 216.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 1.1% less intelligence, 79.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 216.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill