Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 1.3 points higher (48.1 vs 46.8) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1027; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba….
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 48.1 | +2.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 2.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,027.40 | $2,000.35 | +94.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 94.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.89s | 84.79s | +469.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 469.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 2.8% more intelligence, 94.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 469.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill