Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… scores 21.6 points higher (46.8 vs 25.2) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1027 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 25.2 | −46.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 46.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,027.40 | $427.73 | −58.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 58.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.60s | 45.52s | +191.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 191.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 46.2% less intelligence, 58.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 191.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill