Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback): 29.0% more intelligence, 57.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 717.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.9 | 46.3 | +29.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 29.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $482.13 | $206.66 | −57.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 57.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.73s | 46.84s | +717.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 717.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-low/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-low/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill