Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Inkling 2 Small
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)
Inkling 2 Small vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 0.6% less intelligence, 16.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 134.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Inkling 2 Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.8 | 30.6 | −0.6% Inkling 2 Small is 0.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $679.16 | $791.81 | +16.6% Inkling 2 Small is 16.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.20s | 19.24s | +134.6% Inkling 2 Small is 134.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.30 for $573.
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Inkling 2 SmallToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/inkling-2-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/inkling-2-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill