Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fall… scores 23.3 points higher (40.8 vs 17.5) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($622 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fall… when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.8 | 17.5 | −57.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 57.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $622.28 | $145.77 | −76.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 76.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.98s | 24.78s | +314.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 314.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 57.1% less intelligence, 76.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 314.4% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill