Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallb… scores 33.4 points higher (51.9 vs 18.5) but costs 114× as much to run the benchmark ($2177 vs $19.2; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.9 | 18.5 | −64.4% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 64.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,176.82 | $19.16 | −99.1% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 99.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 34.85s | 5.05s | −85.5% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 85.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 64.4% less intelligence, 99.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.5% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill