Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallb… scores 25.9 points higher (51.9 vs 26.0) but costs 9.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2177 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.9 | 26.0 | −49.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 49.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,176.82 | $231.08 | −89.4% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 89.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.08s | 49.47s | +49.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 49.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 49.9% less intelligence, 89.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.5% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill