Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallb… scores 13.9 points higher (49.9 vs 36.0) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($2903 vs $117; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.9 | 36.0 | −27.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 27.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,902.50 | $117.12 | −96.0% Muse Ember (Max) is 96.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 40.24s | 10.09s | −74.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 74.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 27.9% less intelligence, 96.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-xhigh/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-xhigh/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill