Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)56.014.9−73.4% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 73.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$7,259.50Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)360.53s32.00s−91.1% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 91.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.00 / $10.0$0.07 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/glm-4-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/glm-4-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill