Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Grok 3 Reasoning Beta
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Grok 3 Reasoning Beta. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Grok 3 Reasoning Beta | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 10.4 | −81.4% Grok 3 Reasoning Beta is 81.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,259.50 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 380.92s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | — | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/grok-3-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/grok-3-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill