Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallbac… scores 3.6 points higher (56.0 vs 52.4) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($7260 vs $5787; both flagship class). Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallbac… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Wonder (Max).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 52.4 | −6.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 6.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,259.50 | $5,786.78 | −20.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 20.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 367.63s | 40.70s | −88.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 88.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): 6.4% less intelligence, 20.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill