Claude Sonnet 5 (High) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (High) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (High) scores 2.0 points higher (31.7 vs 29.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2086 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Sonnet 5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (High) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.7 | 29.7 | −6.3% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 6.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,086.04 | $1,935.39 | −7.2% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 7.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.10s | 25.04s | +31.1% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 31.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 6.3% less intelligence, 7.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill