Claude Sonnet 5 (High) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (High) by Anthropic or GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (High) scores 6.7 points higher (31.7 vs 25.0) but costs 47× as much to run the benchmark ($2086 vs $44.3; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (High) when you need intelligence above 25.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) when 25.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (High) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.7 | 25.0 | −21.1% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 21.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,086.04 | $44.32 | −97.9% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 97.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.83s | 6.43s | −70.5% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 70.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 21.1% less intelligence, 97.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gpt-5-6-luna-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gpt-5-6-luna-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill