Claude Sonnet 5 (High) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (High) by Anthropic or GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (High) scores 4.2 points higher (31.7 vs 27.5) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2086 vs $350; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (High) when you need intelligence above 27.5, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) when 27.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (High) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.7 | 27.5 | −13.2% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 13.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,086.04 | $350.36 | −83.2% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 83.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.60s | 5.91s | −75.0% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 75.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 13.2% less intelligence, 83.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gpt-5-6-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gpt-5-6-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill