Claude Sonnet 5 (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (High) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 51.7% more intelligence, 56.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 288.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (High) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.7 | 48.1 | +51.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 51.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,086.04 | $909.01 | −56.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 56.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.46s | 83.46s | +288.9% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 288.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gpt-6-1-terra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/gpt-6-1-terra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill