Claude Sonnet 5 (High) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (High) by Anthropic or Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 38.5% more intelligence, 25.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (High) | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.7 | 43.9 | +38.5% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 38.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,086.04 | $1,551.81 | −25.6% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 25.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.10s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill