Claude Sonnet 5 (High) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (High) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (High) scores 5.2 points higher (31.7 vs 26.5) but costs 7.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2086 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (High) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (High) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.7 | 26.5 | −16.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 16.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,086.04 | $282.51 | −86.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 86.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.60s | 6.33s | −73.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 73.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 16.4% less intelligence, 86.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill