Claude Sonnet 5 (High) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (High) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (High) scores 18.9 points higher (31.7 vs 12.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2086 vs $1319; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Sonnet 5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (High) | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.7 | 12.8 | −59.6% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 59.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,086.04 | $1,318.62 | −36.8% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 36.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.46s | 16.78s | −21.8% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 21.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 59.6% less intelligence, 36.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-high/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill