Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) scores 15.8 points higher (24.3 vs 8.5) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($653 vs $25.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.3 | 8.5 | −65.0% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 65.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $652.70 | $25.37 | −96.1% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 96.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.35s | 10.23s | +22.5% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 22.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.32 / $0.89 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low): 65.0% less intelligence, 96.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/deepseek-v3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/deepseek-v3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill