Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Max) scores 23.3 points higher (47.6 vs 24.3) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1536 vs $653; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5 (Low).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.3 | 47.6 | +95.9% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 95.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $652.70 | $1,535.80 | +135.3% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.35s | 105.71s | +1166.0% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 1166.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low): 95.9% more intelligence, 135.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1166.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)GPT-6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/gpt-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/gpt-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill