Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low): 75.7% more intelligence, 56.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 161.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.3 | 42.7 | +75.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 75.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $652.70 | $283.18 | −56.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 56.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.68s | 22.73s | +161.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 161.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill