Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 23.8 points higher (48.1 vs 24.3) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $653; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.3, and Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) when 24.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.3 | 48.1 | +97.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 97.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $652.70 | $2,000.35 | +206.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.46s | 71.36s | +743.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 743.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low): 97.9% more intelligence, 206.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 743.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill