Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 21.1 points higher (45.4 vs 24.3) but costs 7.6× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $653; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 24.3, and Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) when 24.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.3 | 45.4 | +86.8% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 86.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $652.70 | $4,934.79 | +656.1% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 7.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.68s | 62.92s | +624.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 624.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low): 86.8% more intelligence, 656.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 624.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill