Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium): 28.1% more intelligence, 7.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 201.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.1 | 36.0 | +28.1% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 28.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.17 | $1,122.27 | −7.9% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 7.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.58s | 25.87s | +201.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 201.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill