Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) | GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.1 | 14.9 | −47.0% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 47.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.17 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.01s | 19.63s | +117.9% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 117.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.57 / $2.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/glm-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/glm-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill