Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 17.0 points higher (45.1 vs 28.1) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $1218; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.1 | 45.1 | +60.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 60.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.17 | $1,655.27 | +35.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 35.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.02s | 29.94s | +231.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 231.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium): 60.5% more intelligence, 35.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 231.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill