Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) scores 4.7 points higher (34.4 vs 29.7) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3255 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.4 | 29.7 | −13.7% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 13.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,255.40 | $1,935.39 | −40.5% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 40.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.92s | 25.04s | −7.0% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 7.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh): 13.7% less intelligence, 40.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-xhigh/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-xhigh/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill