Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) by Anthropic or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) scores 29.3 points higher (38.2 vs 8.9) but costs 477× as much to run the benchmark ($6998 vs $14.7; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.2 | 8.9 | −76.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 76.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,998.25 | $14.68 | −99.8% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 99.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 184.22s | 56.02s | −69.6% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 69.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Max): 76.7% less intelligence, 99.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill