Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) scores 11.7 points higher (38.2 vs 26.5) but costs 24× as much to run the benchmark ($6998 vs $286; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.2 | 26.5 | −30.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 30.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,998.25 | $286.07 | −95.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 95.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 209.46s | 6.31s | −97.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 97.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Max): 30.6% less intelligence, 95.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill