Command A vs Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)

Command A vs Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

CohereCommand ANot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
-
GoogleGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricCommand AGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.09.4+34.3% Gemma 4 12B (Non-reas… is 34.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.36s6.40s−60.9% Gemma 4 12B (Non-reas… is 60.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.50 / $10.0$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerCommand A: what beats itGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/command-a/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/command-a/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill