DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 24.6 points higher (36.0 vs 11.4) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $461; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 36.0 | +215.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 3.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $1,122.27 | +143.6% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.16s | 25.92s | +28.6% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 28.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 215.8% more intelligence, 143.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill