DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 14.9 | +30.7% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 30.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.16s | 19.29s | −4.3% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 4.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.57 / $2.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill