DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 22.4 | +96.5% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 96.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.76s | 3.83s | −80.6% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 80.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill